covid 19 - the truth behind the scientific hysteria

 

When I started writing this article I had no sympathy with the

anti-lockdown demonstrators. Yet the more I researched the statistics covering the covid pandemic, the more I have come to realise that scientists have used a sledgehammer to swat a fly.  And here's why. 

In 2020 at the beginning of the pandemic we were told that 93 to 97% of deaths from covid were connected to either age or ill health. Diabetes - Cardio Vascular disease - respiratory diseases - cancer - frailty due to age, and obesity (of which the UK has disturbingly high levels) were the main causes for hospitalization and in some cases death. Here's the thing approximately 80% of people suffer mild or no symptoms - 15 to 20% will have pneumonia - 4% will develop ARDS/and or shock with multi-organ failure - 1% will die of the infection.  

This YouTube video by a doctor evaluates 12 autopsies. And is the source of the above percentages.

WARNING GRAPHIC IMAGES 

 Living in the UK today, there are 66.65 million people. Sadly 128,000 have died with covid mentioned on the death certificate. 128,000 represents 0.2% of 66.65 million, leaving 666,650,000 who have not died of covid. To date since January 2020 4,855,169 people have tested positive for covid. This figure is likely to be higher as a proportion of the population who had covid in the early days of the pandemic were not tested. Myself included. 

4,855,169 minus 128,000 = 4,727,169 who recovered. 

Sage in 2020 gave the government an estimated death figure in the first year of up to 500,000 - the actual figure was 68,298. That's a 431,782 short of Sage's predictions.  

In August 2020 Public Health England was forced to remove over 5,000 from it's official death toll due to criticism from the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine who prompted a review of how the numbers were calculated. Until the review, Public Health England counted all deaths where  somebody had tested positive for covid no matter how long ago that test was. The 28 day cut off limit was then introduced. This method still falls far short of accuracy because if a person dies say of a stroke or even if they have been hit by a bus, then if they have tested positive on the 1st of the month and is killed on the 28th day of the month, they are included in the covid figures. With this in mind exactly how accurate is the 128K? Is this 128K figure in truth lower?

The United Kingdom has for decades fought against I.D cards as an attack against our civil liberties. What has changed us from rejecting identity checks, to a population that is accepting covid track and trace, and covid travel passports?

Track and trace goes way passed carrying a card to say who you are, to an Orwellian sense of keeping track of our daily movements. 
So what has caused this change in attitude? A pandemic that should in reality be called an epidemic? 

Anti-vaxxers - have a right not to be vaccinated. As someone who grew up with the prevalence of Tuberculosis, Polio, Smallpox and several other nasty diseases, getting vaccinated against covid, was for me, a 'no brainer'. I can understand the fear of side effects stopping people getting the jab. The figure of serious side effects compared to the millions of jabs administered is extremely low.  Recently there was case of a woman who refused to be vaccinated against covid because she was frightened of having a bad reaction, only to contract the disease and die from it. How sad for her and her family, chances were she would have not had any side effects from the vaccine. I've had both jabs (Astrazeneca) - apart from a slightly sore arm, after all I had been stabbed with a needle, I had no side effects whatsoever. This article on the John Hopkins website explains clearly why vaccination is so important. All that said, I don't agree with compulsory vaccinations. I sympathize with the idea that covid passports are a backdoor to a form of vaccine apartheid.

There is no doubt that covid is a nasty virus leaving some of it's victims with lasting physical disabilities. I speak from personal experience.

I had covid at the beginning of 2020  At the same time my husband also contracted covid.

I was 68, my symptoms were mild and lasted for three days.

I have never smoked.

I do not drink alcohol.

I am at the correct weight for my height.

I have no underlying health problems.

I have fully recovered from covid with no lasting health issues.

My husband had no symptoms other than a slight burning in his chest that lasted a day

He was 64 

An ex-smoker

Has diabetes - high blood pressure.

Drinks alcohol (moderately).

He has been left with a build up of fluid in his lungs that requires an oxygen generator to clear it. 

I mention the above - as it shows clearly that underlying health issues are a large factor with covid. 

As sad as they are, it is not only the deaths due to covid we should worry about - it is the 13 million now on the NHS treatment waiting list. The sharp rise in suicides especially, among the young. The cases of cancer and other serious illness that went untreated thanks to the scientific advised lockdowns, that and people not wanting to bother their GP's (if you were lucky enough to get one to see you) because the NHS was in danger of being overwhelmed.  

Finally the economic devastation that has not yet fully impacted on the nation, must be considered.

It's all very well for scientists with stable jobs, and no fear of redundancy because their company is going bust due to the economy in free fall, to say - LOCKDOWN LOCKDOWN - stay home - don't go to work. Scientists use words like, could, might, possibly, projected scenario - well here's a word for them. Thanks to their lockdown advice to the government - we WILL have an economic depression with all the social consequences of high unemployment and a cash-strapped government. There WILL be deaths from untreated health problems. There WILL be a housing crash. There WILL be homelessness. There WILL  be an economic recession, if not depression, for years to come.

Thanks to Sage terrifying the government (and us) the seven Nightingale hospitals were constructed at a cost of over half a billion pounds. That's a lot of money for treating only 272 patients. Think what that cash could have done for the NHS - half a billion pounds of taxpayers money wasted on scientific maybe, could be, might be. 

At the end of all of this, and there is an inquiry - Sage and the multiple scientists who have terrorized a population into believing their inaccurate predictions should step up and answer to us all - with these words -SORRY we got it wrong.

 

If you are easily offended, and take life way too seriously, then Naughty Novellas are definitely not for you, so please don't buy them. If, you are not one of those people, and love to laugh, then the naughty, but nice humour, between the pages of my Naughty Novellas will tickle your inner naughtiness. So - buy the books and let the fun begin!!

Naughty Novellas, best read with an uncorked bottle of wine and an open box of chocs. Of coarse, if you're not into such decadence – then why are you reading my books? Only – joking – alternative suggestion. Comfy sofa, cup of cocoa – on second thoughts, scrap the cocoa you are way too serious and not yet ready for a Naughty Novella.

Try the paranormal section on the other page. Some real creepy stuff there – could keep you awake at night. Maybe the cup of cocoa idea was a good one after all.

Paranormal Fantasy Books

Naughty Novellas.